The comfort of bricks and mortar
For many people, buy-to-let was once the golden goose of retirement planning. It offered a sense of security, a physical asset you could point to, and a steady stream of income in later life. And let’s be honest, there’s something deeply reassuring about bricks and mortar. You can walk past it, inspect the guttering, and give the front door a fresh coat of paint. It feels real in a way that investments in funds or global equities often don’t.
When familiar becomes friction
But over the years, I’ve seen a shift. What once looked like a straightforward path to financial independence now comes with a great deal more baggage. There’s a growing list of landlords who find themselves burdened, not benefitted, by their property holdings. They haven’t become the source of comfort they expected in retirement. In fact, for some, it’s the part of the plan causing the most stress.
Part of the problem is how the landscape has changed. Costs have crept up steadily, mortgage interest, repairs, lettings fees, compliance requirements. Meanwhile, tax policy has been less than friendly. The removal of mortgage interest relief, tighter capital gains rules, and fully taxable rental income have all chipped away at the returns. The numbers often look a lot better in theory than they do in practice.
The illiquidity issue
And then there’s the issue of access. A property can’t be sold overnight. If you need to free up capital quickly, for an emergency, or just a shift in circumstances, you’re at the mercy of the market, the estate agent, and whether the boiler decides to pack in during the sales process. That’s not ideal when you’re trying to fund a calm and flexible retirement.